ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents ASD37-09: OS generic exploit mitigation (Excellent)

Operating system generic exploit mitigation e.g. Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Address Space Layout Randomisation (ASLR) and Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET).

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 15 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

  • E8-ADMIN-ML3 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML3)
  • ASBv3-PV-3 Define and establish secure configurations for compute resources

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-10.5 Enable Anti-Exploitation Features

FedRAMP High · 1 control

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.9 Configuration management

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.9 Configuration management

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 2.2.6 2.2.6 System security parameters configured against misuse

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution

You are reading one control. How much of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents have you already done?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents ASD37-09 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 32 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 15 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.