APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 61: Para 61 Internal audit review of critical-operation outsourcing and reporting to the Board

What does 61 require?

Internal audit must review any proposed material arrangement that would outsource a critical operation, and must give regular reports to the Board (or its audit committee) on whether such arrangements comply with the service provider management policy.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

Other controls in Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management have you already done?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 61 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 30 of 87 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.034.5% covered · 57 gapsIf you hold DORA31% covered · 60 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 528.7% covered · 62 gapsIf you hold FedRAMP Moderate27.6% covered · 63 gapsIf you hold SOC 224.1% covered · 66 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202221.8% covered · 68 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 4 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls