APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 47: Para 47 Required content of the service provider policy, including fourth parties

The policy must set out the entity's approach to (a) how agreements with material service providers are entered, monitored, substituted and exited; (b) managing the risks of material service providers; and (c) managing the risks of fourth parties (parties a service provider relies on) on which material service providers depend when delivering a critical operation for the entity.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management have you already done?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 47 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 30 of 87 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.034.5% covered · 57 gapsIf you hold DORA31% covered · 60 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 528.7% covered · 62 gapsIf you hold FedRAMP Moderate27.6% covered · 63 gapsIf you hold SOC 224.1% covered · 66 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202221.8% covered · 68 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 4 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls