APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 59: Para 59 Monitor material arrangements and report to senior management

The entity must monitor its material arrangements and make sure senior management gets reporting on them proportionate to the nature and use of the service. Monitoring must include regular assessment of (a) performance against agreed service levels; (b) how effective the controls over the provider risks are; and (c) whether both parties comply with the agreement. For limbs (a) and (c) only: Para 57 can exempt the arrangement (Attachment category provider on standardised terms or no formal agreement), and APRA can exempt it in writing under para 58.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management have you already done?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management 59 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 30 of 87 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.034.5% covered · 57 gapsIf you hold DORA31% covered · 60 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 528.7% covered · 62 gapsIf you hold FedRAMP Moderate27.6% covered · 63 gapsIf you hold SOC 224.1% covered · 66 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202221.8% covered · 68 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 4 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls