Architecture matters for IP-based or multi-site systems. On the corporate network, IT should be involved to define its role, covering at least local and wide area network use, client computers, servers and their software, network switching and routing, malware protection and scanning, updates to software and device firmware, external and internet access, traffic priority and latency, and storage on the network. If the corporate network is unsuitable, a dedicated security systems network should address the same points plus access to business applications such as email and any integrated business systems. A stand-alone system suits a single site with no planned expansion, such as small or isolated locations or covert short-term cameras; multi-site systems can give tiered access, with top users seeing all sites and each site limited to its own cameras.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.