CPTED lowers the risk of malicious acts and other disruptions by combining a site's natural features, the built environment and the behaviour associated with a place, using organizational, mechanical and natural methods designed into facilities. It focuses on shaping the physical setting to reduce fear and the likelihood of certain acts, understanding behaviour in relation to space, redesigning or re-using space to encourage wanted behaviour and discourage illegitimate activity, and strengthening ownership and territoriality (the capable guardian idea); it aims to lower an adversary's confidence and motivation and raise the resources and knowledge they would need. Its three categories are mechanical measures (hardware and technology), organizational measures (policies and activities encouraging observation, reporting and intervention, with training and a sense of ownership) and natural or architectural measures (design and use of space). Typical measures: natural access control with physical and symbolic barriers steering movement to set points; natural surveillance inside and out; territorial reinforcement and boundary definition; signage showing the intended use of space; managed, maintained spaces that look cared for; activity support that draws legitimate users and deters illegitimate ones; and more depth through layers of public and private use with clear boundaries.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.