Processing that is lawful can still be unfair: people should only be recorded in ways they would reasonably expect, judged objectively in the circumstances, and without unjustified adverse effects. Places with heightened privacy expectations, such as private property, public toilets and changing rooms, should be monitored only in the most exceptional circumstances to deal with very serious concerns (cameras in school toilets are unlikely to be proportionate). The organisation should weigh new or unexpected technology, intrusion where behaviour is not modified and the chilling effect on how people behave and move, and reflect this in a DPIA before deployment.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.