Each derived requirement is identified and its effect on function and safety judged for acceptability at each higher level in turn, until nothing further propagates upward; how they are identified and judged is written into the development assurance planning, consistent with what the safety assessment process sets out to achieve.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.