Agencies should make sure that, for both urgent and routine changes: the process for managing change, as the relevant information security documentation defines it, is followed; the relevant authority approves the proposed change; any proposed change that could affect a system's security or accreditation status is put to the Accreditation Authority to approve; and every related information security document is brought up to date to reflect the change.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.