An agency that wants to run a product in a configuration outside its evaluation must carry out a security risk assessment that covers: why the unevaluated configuration is necessary; testing of that configuration; and the environment where the product will operate in that configuration.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.