A person must not intercept, or attempt to intercept, a wire communication unless the chapter 179 court-order procedure is followed, or the interception has the prior consent of one party AND an emergency makes obtaining a court order impractical (then subject to ratification under 200.620(3)). A business recording calls cannot rely on one party's consent alone; as reported, the Nevada Supreme Court requires all parties' consent to record a call, so recorded lines should announce recording to every party. Wilful and knowing violation is a category D felony with civil damages (200.690).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.