The OpsCon analyses the proposed system: a qualitative and, where possible, quantitative summary of the benefits (new, enhanced and deleted capabilities and improved performance), each related to the deficiencies identified (A.2.9.2); a summary of disadvantages and limitations, such as retraining, workspace changes, a new interface style, desired features left out, degraded existing capabilities or slow response for complex operations (A.2.9.3); and the major operational alternatives considered, with what the trade-offs showed and why each choice was made, so that it can later be seen why an approach was chosen or rejected (A.2.9.4).
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.