Review fails through inconsistent or inaccurate coding across reviewers and batches as volumes grow; through inadvertent disclosure of privileged, confidential or sensitive ESI; through relevant material missed by poorly designed searches or unvalidated technology; through classification errors in material needing special handling; and through cost that is out of proportion to the matter because the review approach was not chosen deliberately.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.