Because documentation is critical, the DEFR records every activity so nothing in the four processes is left out (which also helps trace evidence gathered abroad in cross-border cases); checks the date and time on any running device against a reliable, traceable time source and records the settings and any difference, without altering the system, leaving retrieval to properly trained staff where it needs much interaction; records what the screen shows (running programs and processes, open document names) with a description, since malware may pose as familiar software; records every movement of devices as local rules require; and records unique identifiers of devices and their parts (serial numbers, distinctive marks). Annex B gives a minimum set for cross-jurisdiction exchange, and ISO/IEC 17025 gives further guidance on document and record control.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.