Monitoring and review exist to check and raise the quality and effectiveness of the process's design, implementation and results, and are planned into it (ISO 31000:2018, 6.6), covering planning, collecting and analysing information, recording what is found and feeding it back. For AI they compare the process with how the system actually behaves in use, pick up drift, new risks and changed context, and point to improvements.
This control maps to 6 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 6 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.