The organization states how much risk, and of what kinds, it is prepared or not prepared to take, and fixes criteria for judging how significant a risk is (ISO 31000:2018, 6.3.4), considering: the kinds of uncertainty, tangible or intangible, that can affect outcomes and objectives; how consequences and likelihood are defined and measured; timing factors; whether measurement is consistent; how a level of risk is arrived at; how several risks together or in sequence are handled; and the organization's capacity. For AI the criteria also reflect the Annex A objectives and effects on individuals and society, not only on the organization.
This control maps to 4 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 4 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.