An organization claiming conformance has documentary evidence showing: which roles for data quality management it has defined; which persons hold them; which responsibilities each role carries (a job description can show both); that the data quality processes are built into its other business processes across the organization (an organization-wide process model can show this); that those processes are actually carried out (specifications of data requirements, data quality measurement results, a nonconformity log and a log of root-cause analyses with the corrective actions taken); and that the assigned roles and responsibilities are audited to check performance and, where needed, to start and carry through improvements.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.