The organization plans, sets up, runs and keeps up one or more audit programmes that fix how often, how and by whom audits are done, how they are planned and how they are reported, giving weight to how important the processes are and what earlier audits found. For each audit it (a) sets the criteria and scope; it (b) chooses auditors and runs audits in a way that keeps the process objective and impartial; (c) makes sure results reach the relevant management; and (d) makes sure audit findings are acted on as appropriate. Documented information showing how the programme was carried out and what the audits found is kept available.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 55001:2024 9.2.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 55001:2024 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 55001:2014 and 27 of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 55001:2014 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.