The information security risk approach and methods are aligned with those used for the organisation's other risks, and the choice is documented. Because ISO/IEC 27001:2022 6.1.2 b) requires repeated assessments to give consistent, valid and comparable results, the method ensures consistency (the same risks in the same context yield similar results whoever assesses them and whenever), comparability (criteria make equivalent levels of different risks come out comparably) and validity (results match reality as closely as possible). Operational risk management methods are the usual choice; the method may treat residual risk in any suitable way, the common practice being to assess likelihood and consequence on current risk.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.