Fixes the ASIL-linked independence of confirmation measures for motorcycles. Confirmation that the item and its elements are functionally safe rests on reviews of the key work products in this part's Table 1 (replacing part 2 Table 1 for motorcycles and applied to the work products the safety plan calls for, per part 2 6.4.10), an audit of how the required processes were carried out (part 2 6.4.11), and an assessment of the safety the item achieved or a developed element's contribution to it (part 2 6.4.12). Independence is organisational, to keep the view impartial; reports identify the documents examined and their revisions; measures are redone or extended after a change; and reviews and audits may be folded into the assessment when handling comparable variants. Table 1's independence levels by ASIL are not held.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.