When choosing appointed parties, the organization reviews every tender document for how it proposes to satisfy the security requirements in the security management plan, and judges each candidate organization's grasp of security, its capability, competence and track record, and what security training, coaching or support it would need.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.