Passing information between project stages means the lead appointed party delivers it, the appointing party checks it against the requirements and iterates, and the appointing party then supplies information for the following stage, checked against what that stage needs. Procedures for approval and acceptance should be agreed and written down before the first exchange. A second check at the start of a stage is especially important where the appointed party changes or there has been a delay, and information should be checked if the lead appointed party changes part way through a stage, taking account of any limits on the outgoing party's information.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.