Planning delivery falls to every lead appointed party and every appointed party, in answer to the appointing party's requirements and the scope of its appointment. Every plan should say how information will satisfy the AIR or EIR; when it will be delivered (first by stage or milestone, later by actual date); how it will be delivered and coordinated with other parties' information; what is delivered; who is responsible; and who receives it. Some planning should happen before appointment so the appointing party can review it, with more during mobilisation and whenever things change. Before technical work begins, the delivery team should confirm that appointment conditions are agreed, processes are in place, the plan fits capacity, the skills exist and the technology supports the standard, with training scheduled. Delivery happens through predefined exchanges, meeting the requirements is a completion criterion, and each container is linked to requirements.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.