Guidance: the evidence gathered should be assessed against the criteria so that findings can be reached, which can indicate conformity or nonconformity and, when the plan specifies, conformity and good practice with supporting evidence, improvement opportunities and recommendations. Nonconformities and their evidence should be recorded, can be graded quantitatively or qualitatively according to the organization's context and risks, and should be reviewed with the auditee to obtain acknowledgement that the evidence is accurate and the nonconformities understood, with every attempt to resolve diverging opinions and unresolved issues recorded in the report. The team should meet to review findings at appropriate stages.
This control maps to 12 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 12 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.