Five principles steer how each requirement is applied, so that GHG information gives an honest and fair picture: relevance (choose sources, sinks, reservoirs, data and methods that suit what the intended user needs); completeness (cover every relevant emission and removal); consistency (allow comparisons that mean something); accuracy (keep bias and uncertainty to the practical minimum); and transparency (disclose enough suitable information so intended users can decide with reasonable confidence).
This control maps to 3 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.