India AI Governance Guidelines (2025)

Part 4: practical guidelines for industry and regulators – India AI Governance Guidelines (2025)

India AI Governance Guidelines (2025) 4.I.5: Industry: publish transparency reports on risk of harm in the Indian context, sharing sensitive content confidentially with regulators

What does 4.I.5 require?

Developers and deployers publish transparency reports evaluating how the system could harm individuals and society in India specifically; where reports contain sensitive or proprietary information they are shared confidentially with the relevant regulators.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

Other controls in Part 4: practical guidelines for industry and regulators – India AI Governance Guidelines (2025)

4.I.1 Industry: comply with all applicable Indian laws, including those protecting women, children and vulnerable groups
4.I.2 Industry: demonstrate compliance when called upon by agencies or sectoral regulators
4.I.3 Industry: adopt voluntary measures on privacy, security, fairness, inclusivity, non-discrimination and transparency
4.I.4 Industry: create a grievance redressal mechanism with resolution in a reasonable timeframe
4.I.6 Industry: explore techno-legal solutions such as privacy-enhancing technologies, machine unlearning, algorithmic auditing and automated bias detection
4.R Regulators: pursue the twin goals, stay agile, prioritise real harm, avoid compliance-heavy requirements, choose the least burdensome instrument and use techno-legal approaches

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpoint All India AI Governance Guidelines (2025) controls