ICH E6(R3) Annex 2 (Use of Decentralised Elements in Clinical Trials) is the new section establishing principles for decentralised clinical trial (DCT) elements - reflecting COVID-19 acceleration + technology enablement + patient-centric trial design. Decentralised elements: remote participant identification + recruitment + screening; eConsent + remote consent + multimedia + comprehension verification; remote/home-based study procedures + nurse visits; direct-to-patient supply (investigational product shipment to home); remote monitoring + visit substitution + ePRO + telemedicine; wearable devices + sensors + continuous data collection; eSource + EHR integration + real-world data; remote source document verification + investigator oversight + risk-based approach. R3 emphasises: investigator oversight + accountability remains + protocol design considers DCT element risks + benefits + scientific validity + participant safety; regulatory pre-discussion advisable; vendor management for DCT-enabling technology + qualification + data integrity. eConsent: validated platform + electronic signature + identity verification + 21 CFR Part 11 + EU CTR; remote consent considerations (privacy + connectivity + family member presence); withdrawal mechanism. Remote monitoring: central + risk-based + statistical + on-site as triggered; sponsor + CRO oversight; investigator visibility. Wearables: vendor qualification + data integrity + ALCOA+ alignment + FDA Software as Medical Device (SaMD) + EMA + algorithm validation + clinical evidence. Real-World Evidence (RWE): EHR data + claims + registries + patient-generated; FDA + EMA RWE guidance + use for hybrid + synthetic control arms; ICH E20 (Adaptive Designs) integration. Coordinates with FDA Decentralised Clinical Trial Guidance + EMA Decentralised Clinical Trials Q&A + Health Canada + PMDA + 21 CFR Part 11 + ALCOA+ + WHO. ICH E6 + Annex 2 + DCT + eConsent + Wearables + RWE applies.
This control maps to 16 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 16 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.