The system correctly implements every limitation and exclusion set by the player or the operator as the regulatory body requires: where limitations and exclusions are managed directly, the Limitations and Exclusions sections of Appendix A are evaluated; a player's self-imposed limitations never override more restrictive operator limits, the more restrictive taking priority; and internal status events, for example self-exclusion orders and their revocation, do not weaken the limitations.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.