Where a law permits processing on consent, the controller has to be able to show that consent was given; a request within a written declaration covering other matters must be clearly distinguishable, intelligible, accessible and in plain language; consent can be withdrawn at any time without affecting prior processing, and the data subject is told this beforehand; consent is effective only if freely given, judged by the circumstances, with the purpose and, where needed or requested, the consequences of refusal explained; consent to special categories must name them expressly.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.