FedRAMP High SI-4(2): Automated Tools and Mechanisms for Real-Time Analysis

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 21 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-07 Incident data and metadata are collected, and their integrity and provenance are preserved

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
8.15 Logging
8.16 Monitoring activities

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 2 controls

ASD37-28 Continuous incident detection and response (Excellent)
ASD37-30 Endpoint detection and response (Very Good)

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
SOC2-CC7.2 Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC04-BP02 Capture logs, findings, and metrics in standardized locations

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-LT-1 Enable threat detection capabilities

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-16 Logging and Monitoring - Configuration

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-LOG-03 Security Monitoring and Alerting

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.14.06 System Monitoring

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.3e Advanced Automation and Analytics Capabilities

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-SI-4 System monitoring

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

10.4.1.1 Automated mechanisms for log review

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High SI-4(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free