FedRAMP High
IA - Identification and Authentication

FedRAMP High IA-4(4): Identifier Management | Identify User Status. Manage individual identifiers by uniquely identifying each individual as [Assignment: organization-defined characteristic identifying individual status]

Identifier Management | Identify User Status. Manage individual identifiers by uniquely identifying each individual as [Assignment: organization-defined characteristic identifying individual status]

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 9 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.16 Identity management

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.16 Identity management
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 7.2.4 All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: • At least once every six months. • To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function.

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IA - Identification and Authentication

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IA-4(4) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 9 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.