FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Part11.CSV: Computer system validation + risk-based approach (21 CFR §11.10(a) + 2003 FDA Scope and Application Guidance + 2023 CSA draft)
Section 11.10(a) requires VALIDATION of closed systems to ensure accuracy + reliability + consistent intended performance + the ability to discern invalid or altered records. Validation is operationalised through: (a) Computer System Validation (CSV) lifecycle including URS (User Requirements Specification) + FS (Functional Specification) + DS (Design Specification) + IQ (Installation Qualification) + OQ (Operational Qualification) + PQ (Performance Qualification) + risk assessment + traceability matrix + validation summary report + ongoing validation maintenance; (b) GAMP 5 framework (ISPE Good Automated Manufacturing Practice) categorising systems as Category 1 (infrastructure software) through Category 5 (custom software) with proportionate validation rigour; (c) ICH Q9 (Quality Risk Management) + ICH Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System) risk-based approaches; (d) FDA 2003 SCOPE AND APPLICATION GUIDANCE (the 'enforcement discretion' guidance) clarifying that Part 11 requirements should be implemented based on RISK + CRITICALITY + intended use - not strictly across all systems; (e) FDA 2023 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ASSURANCE (CSA) DRAFT GUIDANCE proposing a modernised approach focused on critical thinking + risk + intended use + appropriate testing - reducing the prescriptive testing burden of traditional CSV; (f) Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) expectations for medical device + production software per the Cures Act 524B + the FDA 2024 pre-market cybersecurity guidance. The CSV-to-CSA transition is the most significant modernisation of Part 11 implementation in the past decade.
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 60 controls across 33 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33 Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33