EU AI Act EUAI-Art.25: Responsibilities along the AI value chain
Distributors/importers/deployers/other third parties become providers when they place on the market or put into service under their own name or trademark, substantially modify the system, or modify the intended purpose making it high-risk. The original provider shall cooperate with the new provider, providing access to information, technical access and other assistance reasonably needed.
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 20 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
AIRMF-GV-6.1 Policies and procedures are in place that address AI risks associated with third-party entities, including risks of infringement of a third party's intellectual property or other rights
AIRMF-MP-4.1 Approaches for mapping AI technology and legal risks of its components, including the use of third-party data or software, are in place, followed, and documented, as are risks of infringement of a third party's intellectual property or other rights
AIRMF-MP-4.2 Internal risk controls for components of the AI system including third-party AI technologies are identified and documented
You are reading one control. How much of EU AI Act have you already done?
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.25 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.