ETSI EN 304 223 Securing AI 5.1.3-3: Assurance over external parties responsible for AI risks

What does 5.1.3-3 require?

Where an external entity carries responsibility for AI security risks found inside the organisation's infrastructure, the system operator should obtain assurance that the entity is capable of addressing them.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

Other controls in Clause 5.1: Secure design (Principles 1 to 4) – ETSI EN 304 223 Securing AI

5.1.1-1 AI security content in the cyber security training programme
5.1.1-2 Ongoing staff awareness of AI threats, with secure AI coding training for developers
5.1.2-1 Assess the need, the risks and the mitigations before building an AI system
5.1.2-2 Design for resilience against adversarial attack, unexpected input and failure
5.1.2-3 Create an audit trail for the AI system
5.1.2-4 AI-specific risk assessment and due diligence for external components
5.1.2-5 Match intended use to data sensitivity, and encourage staff to report AI security risks
5.1.2-6 Least-privilege, risk-assessed permissions for the AI system on other systems

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpoint All ETSI EN 304 223 Securing AI controls