Beyond SBM-3 the undertaking discloses the results of its climate resilience analysis for its material climate risks, explaining the implications for strategy and business model, how scenario analysis effects (if used) inform its response, and how its transition plan and current and planned mitigation and adaptation actions contribute to resilience; the significant areas of uncertainty in the assessment; and its capacity to adjust or adapt strategy and business model over the short, medium and long term, considering available and flexible financial resources, the ability to redeploy, repurpose, upgrade or decommission assets, the effect of current and planned investments and cross-referring to E1-5 actions. The analysis is as at the reporting date, is updated when the risk assessment is updated, and financial institutions may draw on prudential resilience disclosures.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.