Detailed table for choosing a programming language (textual, diagrammatic or modelling). Documented and defined operational semantics is R at Basic Integrity, HR at SIL 1 and 2 and M at SIL 3 and 4; support for modular approaches, commenting, a strong type system with checking, static analysis, testing and test coverage metrics are each R at Basic Integrity and HR at SIL 1 to 4. The choice follows the requirements of 7.3; D.54 explains how to judge suitability. EN 50716 replaced EN 50128's list of named languages with these generic criteria.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.