Process assurance should ensure the hardware plans are available as set in planning and the PHAC; reviews are held per plan and actions closed; deviations from plans and standards are detected, recorded, evaluated, approved, tracked and resolved; transition criteria are satisfied per plan (audits being an effective method for these); an inspection such as a first article inspection confirms the item is built to its design data; records of process assurance, including assessment of design activity completion, are produced; and subcontractor processes are consistent with the hardware plans.
This control maps to 3 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.