The team ought to show that its AV deals effectively with the four general hazards of a vehicle control system: unintended acceleration or deceleration (running into something, or being hit from behind); failing to speed up or slow down when needed; an unplanned sideways movement (for example into another vehicle's path); and failing to move sideways when needed (for example leaving the road edge). The note suggests treating the human driver as a model: a monitoring system independent of the vehicle controls, independent actuators, an independent power supply, and diversity from the vehicle's own designs.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.