BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 4.10.3.1: Metal detection in place unless risk assessment shows a more effective alternative

What does 4.10.3.1 require?

Metal detection equipment must be in place unless a risk assessment shows it does not improve food safety, with the justification documented; absence would normally rest on a more effective alternative such as X-ray, fine sieves or filtration.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated 21 May 2026

Other controls in Section 4: Site standards – BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9

4.1.1 4.1.1 Local activities and site environment assessed, with protective measures reviewed on change
4.1.2 4.1.2 External areas and traffic routes maintained
4.1.3 4.1.3 Building fabric maintained against pests, water and contaminants
4.1.4 4.1.4 Controlled access with visitor records, briefed contractors and visitors, and staff trained in security
4.10.1.1 4.10.1.1 A documented assessment of each process for foreign-body detection or removal equipment
4.10.1.2 4.10.1.2 Type, location and sensitivity of detection specified, validated and justified to best practice
4.10.1.3 4.10.1.3 Test frequency defined against customer requirements and the ability to hold product; corrective action on failure
4.10.1.4 4.10.1.4 Detected foreign material investigated and rejects analysed for trends

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpoint All BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls