Australia National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers 2024
Part 2 The health risk management approach: risk categories, assessment types and timing, reporting framework, categorisation steps, authorising health professionals, administration, privacy and quality control – Australia National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers 2024

Australia National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers 2024 2.6.4: Communicating with workers: inform workers of their obligations and protections under the Standard and the law, alert them to assessment requirements and status, and after any outcome other than Fit for Duty Unconditional discuss the implications and arrangements, record them with the outcome and review requirements, and give the worker a copy of the report; provide a documented process for complaints and disagreements with the process or outcome, starting with the examining health professional, then review by the Chief Medical Officer or operator with input from treating doctors or a second opinion, and advise workers of the AHP Program, ONRSR and privacy commissioner channels

What does 2.6.4 require?

The rail transport operator communicates with rail safety workers about their obligations and protections under the Standard and relevant legislation, including the purpose of assessments, the operator's policies, how health information is managed, and the duty to report health concerns affecting safe work, and keeps specific mechanisms to alert workers to their assessment requirements and status. When a worker is assessed as anything other than Fit for Duty Unconditional, the operator discusses with them the implications for their work and the policies or arrangements to apply, records those arrangements on the database with the outcome and any review requirements, and ensures the worker receives a copy of the assessment report. Because a worker may disagree with a request, the conduct of an assessment or its outcome, the operator addresses complaints and disagreements in its procedures: medical issues are discussed first with the examining Authorised Health Professional, then the worker may seek review by the Chief Medical Officer or the operator, drawing on the treating doctor or specialist or a second opinion from another Authorised Health Professional, with the Chief Medical Officers Council available to help; complaints about an Authorised Health Professional may go to the AHP Program, general complaints to ONRSR and privacy complaints to the relevant commissioner, and workers are told how to complain and receive the outcome.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

Other controls in Part 2 The health risk management approach: risk categories, assessment types and timing, reporting framework, categorisation steps, authorising health professionals, administration, privacy and quality control – Australia National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers 2024

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.