Australia AI Ethics Framework
AI Ethics Principles

Australia AI Ethics Framework AUAIE-5: Reliability and safety

Across the lifecycle an AI system should reliably operate in accordance with its intended purpose, being reliable, accurate and reproducible as appropriate. It should not pose unreasonable safety risks and should adopt safety measures proportionate to the magnitude of potential risk. Systems should be monitored and tested so they continue to meet their purpose, identified problems should be addressed through ongoing risk management, and responsibility for ensuring robustness and safety should be clearly and appropriately assigned.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 7 controls across 5 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • A.6.2.4 AI system verification and validation
  • AIRMF-MS-2.7 AI system security and resilience as identified in the MAP function are evaluated and documented

OECD AI Principles · 1 control

  • OECDAI-3 Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
  • OECDAI24-6 Security, Model and Data Protection, Intellectual Property, and Environmental Sustainability

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in AI Ethics Principles

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 7 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.