The resources needed for monitoring and measurement to give valid, reliable results are identified and provided; they are suitable for the task and kept in good order, and records show they are fit for purpose. 9100 adds a process for calling in monitoring and measuring equipment that needs calibration or verification, and a register of such equipment showing its type, unique identity, location, and the method, frequency and acceptance criteria for calibration or verification; the register covers test hardware and test software, automated test equipment, plotters that produce verification data, and equipment owned by employees or supplied by customers. Where traceability of measurement is required, or the organization regards it as essential, equipment is calibrated or verified at set intervals against standards traceable to international or national standards (with the basis recorded where none exists), marked to show its status, and protected against adjustment, damage or deterioration. Under 9100, calibration and verification take place in suitable environmental conditions. If equipment is found to be unfit, the organization establishes whether earlier results were compromised and acts accordingly.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.