Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)
Section 3: Principles, legal grounds and GDPR duties for employers – Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)

Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249) 3.2.2: 3.2.2 Data protection impact assessment for high-risk monitoring and prior consultation if residual risk stays high

Where monitoring, particularly with new technology, probably carries high risk, such as systematic and extensive automated evaluation with significant effects, the employer must assess its impact on data protection (a DPIA), and if the residual risk remains high it must consult the supervisory authority before starting. EDPB Opinion 12/2018 later confirmed that employee monitoring can meet the vulnerable data subjects and systematic monitoring criteria for a DPIA.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

GDPR · 2 controls

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Section 3: Principles, legal grounds and GDPR duties for employers – Article 29 Working Party Opinion 2/2017 on Data Processing at Work (WP249)

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.