APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
CBPR Program Requirements: Security Safeguards

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-29: Employee security awareness

The applicant makes employees aware of the importance of maintaining the security of personal information, for example through regular training and oversight.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 22 controls across 13 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

C5 (Germany) · 3 controls

  • C5-HR-02 Employment terms and conditions
  • C5-HR-03 Security training and awareness programme
  • C5-SIM-04 Duty of the users to report security incidents to a central body

HIPAA Security Rule · 3 controls

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 3 controls

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • AT-2 Literacy Training and Awareness
  • AT-3 Role-Based Training

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • AT-2 Literacy Training and Awareness
  • AT-3 Role-Based Training

APPI · 1 control

  • AUCDR-IS-6 Information security training and awareness program

GDPR · 1 control

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CBPR Program Requirements: Security Safeguards

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-29 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 22 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.