APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
CBPR Program Requirements: Uses of Personal Information

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-12: Disclosure consistent with original purpose

Disclosures and transfers are undertaken to fulfil the original purpose of collection or another compatible or related purpose.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APPI · 1 control

  • APPI-A27 Restriction on Provision to Third Parties
  • AUCDR-PS-6 Privacy Safeguard 6 - Use or disclosure of CDR data
  • MYHR-CUD-1 Authorised collection, use and disclosure only
  • APP-6 APP 6 - Use or disclosure of personal information

CCPA/CPRA · 1 control

  • CCR §7050 Service Provider and Contractor Obligations

GDPR · 1 control

  • GDPR-Art.5 Principles relating to processing of personal data

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • NIST800-PT-3 PT-3 Personally Identifiable Information Processing Purposes

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-P6.1 P6.1 Disclosure to third parties with consent

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CBPR Program Requirements: Uses of Personal Information

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-12 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.