APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
Data Minimization

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-02: Collection Limitation

Limit collection of personal information to what is relevant to identified purposes and obtain it by lawful and fair means.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27701:2019 · 3 controls

  • 7.2.1 Identify and document purpose
  • 7.2.2 Identify lawful basis
  • 7.4.1 Limit collection

GDPR · 2 controls

  • GDPR-Art.25 Data protection by design and by default
  • GDPR-Art.5 Principles relating to processing of personal data

APPI · 1 control

  • APPI-A20 Proper Acquisition and Special Care Required Personal Information
  • AUCDR-PS-3 Privacy Safeguard 3 - Seeking to collect CDR data from CDR participants
  • MYHR-CUD-1 Authorised collection, use and disclosure only
  • APP-3 APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information

CCPA/CPRA · 1 control

  • CCR §7060 Consumer Identity Verification

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-P3.1 P3.1 Collecting personal information consistent with objectives

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-02 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.