Access to video-surveillance personal data is limited to the controller/processor's responsible person and those they authorise; footage must not be used contrary to the Art. 26 purpose. The system must be protected from unauthorised access, and the controller/processor must establish an automated logging system recording the time, place and identity of persons who accessed the footage. Competent state bodies may access within their legal remit.
This control maps to 3 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.