No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a listening device to eavesdrop on, listen to, record or monitor a private conversation they are not part of unless every party to it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, specified law enforcement safety monitoring with one party's consent, and incidental recording by the overt use of body-worn cameras or tablets by police, ambulance officers and prescribed persons. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). A party to a conversation recording it is not caught by s 6, but communicating or publishing that recording is restricted by s 11. For employers, audio capture of workers' private conversations (for example audio-enabled CCTV, call or meeting recording by a non-party) needs the consent of every party.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.