No one knowingly passes on or publishes a recording or account of a private conversation or private activity produced, directly or indirectly, by a listening, optical surveillance or tracking device. This applies even where the recording itself was lawful, for example a party recording their own conversation. Permitted: with every party's express or implied consent; no more than is reasonably necessary in the public interest or to protect the lawful interests of the person communicating it; in legal or disciplinary proceedings; protected information; specified law enforcement communications; communications to police authorised by an authorised police officer; and communications authorised by Commonwealth national security law. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.