People assigned to oversee automated decisions should stay engaged, critical and able to challenge outputs; where automation only supports a human decision, the decision-maker should check the recommendation rather than apply it routinely, have real influence including authority and competence to go against it, and weigh and interpret it with all the input information and other factors. Cutting pay automatically on a system's poor-performance flag without such oversight infringes the ADM rules.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.